send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
With reference to State Emergency, consider the following statements:
1. A law made by the Parliament during a State Emergency becomes inoperative six months after the emergency has ceased to operate.
2. A State Emergency does not affect the Fundamental Rights of the citizens of that state.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Statement 1 is incorrect. A law made by the President, the Parliament or any other specified authority continues to be operative even after the emergency has been revoked. It can be repealed, altered or re-enacted by the state legislature afterwards. Statement 2 is correct. A state emergency has no effect on Fundamental Rights of the citizens.
By: abhimanu admin ProfileResourcesReport error
Seema
cofusion in laxmikant it is told that state emergancy (president rule) effect the fundamental rights of citizens
Kindly revisit- President's rule under Art.356 has no effect on Fundamental rights of the citizens.
Access to prime resources
New Courses