send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
With reference to Joint Sitting, consider the following statements:
1. The provision of joint sitting is not applicable to Constitutional Amendment bill .
2. In the absence of Speaker, Chairman of Rajya Sabha presides over the Joint Sitting.
3. At a joint sitting, only Lok Sabha can propose new amendments and not the Rajya Sabha.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 and 2 only
1 only
2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
Statement 1 is correct:Joint sitting is not applicable to constitutional amendment bill and money bills. Statement 2 is incorrect: In the absence of Speaker, Deputy Speaker presides over the Joint Sitting. Statement 3 is incorrect: New Amendments cannot be proposed at a joint sitting.
By: abhimanu admin ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses