send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following statements is correct with respect to General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR)?
It is designed to prevent tax avoidance in cross border transactions only.
Its provisions are included in the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Its provisions are effective from January 2019.
As of now, there are no appellate tribunals to appeal against the decisions of tax authorities regarding GAAR provisions.
The introduction of General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) is a watershed event in the evolution of India’s tax policy and legislation. GAAR is an anti-tax avoidance law under Chapter X-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of India. It is framed by the Department of Revenue under the Ministry of Finance. GAAR has been made effective from 1 April 2017. Hence option b is the correct answer and option c is not the correct statement. • GAAR applies to any arrangement that is considered an Impermissible Avoidance Arrangement (IAA). Furthermore, under its provisions, certain transactions are deemed to lack commercial substance. GAAR is not merely restricted to cross-border transactions, but also applies to domestic arrangements. Once the Revenue authorities decide to treat an arrangement as an IAA, the onus to prove otherwise is on taxpayers. Consequently, they are required to substantiate the commercial reasons for such arrangements and that availing tax benefit was not the main purpose for these transactions. Hence option a is not the correct statement. • Under the Income Tax act, a taxpayer has the right to appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) against an order passed by the Revenue authorities along with the direction of the Approving Panel. (A subsequent appeal may be filed before a High Court and the Supreme Court.). Hence option d is not the correct statement.
By: abhimanu admin ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses