send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements regarding the doctrine of pith and substance.
1.If the substance falls within union list,then the incidental encroachment by the law on the state list does not make it invalid.
2.In India the Doctrine came to be established in the pre-independence period under the government of India Act, 1935.
Choose the correct statements
Only 1
Only 2
Both 1 and 2
None of these
Correct: Laws made by the Union can incidentally encroach on the State list if the main subject is in the Union list.
Correct: This doctrine was established in India during the pre-independence era under the Government of India Act, 1935.
By: Kamal Kashyap ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses