send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements about Uday Kotak committee and choose the correct one/s
This committee was formed for improving standards of corporate governance of listed companies in India.
The committee was constituted by Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).
The committee recommended increasing the maximum number of listed company’s directorships.
Code:
1 and 2 only
2 and 3 only
1 and 3 only
All of the above
The Kotak Committee on Corporate Governance (hereinafter referred to as 'The Committee') was constituted on June 2, 2017, under the chairmanship of Uday Kotak. Its primary objective was improving standards concerning corporate governance of listed companies in India.
The Committee was represented by different stakeholders, including the government, the industry, stock exchanges, academicians, proxy advisors, professional bodies, lawyers, etc. It was requested to provide recommendations on diverse issues such as ensuring independence in spirit of independent directors and their active participation in the functioning of the company, and improving safeguards and disclosures pertaining to related party transactions.
Uday Kotak Committee Recommendations:
a) Panel proposed more powers for independent directors, limiting chairmanship to non-executive directors, and called for a greater focus on transparency and disclosures to improve corporate governance.
b) The panel recommended that a listed company should have at least six directors on its board. Current Sebi regulations do not mandate a minimum number. The panel has suggested at least one independent director be a woman.
c) It also proposed that directors attend at least half the total board meetings held in a financial year. If they fail to do so, they would require shareholders’ nod for continuing.
d) Companies have asked to make public the relevant skills of directors, and the age of non-executive directors has been capped at 75 years.
e) In addition, the chairperson of a listed company will be a non-executive director to ensure that s/he is independent of the management.
f) An independent director cannot be in more than eight listed companies and a managing director can hold the post of an independent director in only three listed companies.
g) The committee has recommended that the number of independent directors on a company board be increased from 33% to 50%.
h) The minimum sitting fees of independent directors has been halved from the current Rs1 lakh per meeting as stipulated by the Companies Act 2013 to Rs50,000 for the top 100 companies by market capitalization.
i) Detailed reasons would need to be furnished when an independent director resigns. This is to ensure that they remain independent of the company management.
j) An audit committee is being proposed with the mandate to look into utilization of funds infused by a listed entity into unlisted subsidiaries, including foreign subsidiaries in cases where the total investment is at least Rs100 crore or 10% of the asset size of the subsidiary.
k) The committee has also recommended that Sebi should have clear powers to act against auditors under the securities law.
l) For government companies, the committee has recommended that the board have final say on the appointment of independent directors and not the nodal ministry.
m) The panel has also proposed to tweak the definition of a “material” subsidiary to one whose net worth or income exceeds 10% (currently 20%) of the consolidated income, or net worth of the listed entity. This has been done to improve disclosure, since only the activities of material subsidiaries are disclosed to shareholders.
In light of the recent and alarming corporate frauds and banking scams, SEBI’s sanction to the Committee’s recommendations would in all likelihood make the contemporary corporate scenario more transparent, accountable and sustainable.
By: Kamal Kashyap ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses