send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
With reference to the Right to Constitutional Remedies, consider the following statements:
1.It makes all the fundamental rights effective.
2.Fundamental Rights violated only by the government can be entertained by Courts.
3.In case of grave violation of fundamental rights concerned State High Court is always bound to admit such petitions.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
Only One
Only Two
All Three
None
1 only
It makes all the fundamental rights effective: This statement is correct. The Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32) empowers individuals to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. It ensures that all fundamental rights are not merely paper rights but can be directly enforced through the judicial process.
Fundamental Rights violated only by the government can be entertained by Courts: This statement is incorrect. Fundamental rights can be violated not only by the government but also by private individuals or entities. The courts can entertain petitions related to violations of fundamental rights by any entity, not just the government.
In case of grave violation of fundamental rights, the concerned State High Court is always bound to admit such petitions: This statement is not accurate. While the High Courts have the authority to entertain petitions related to the violation of fundamental rights, they are not always bound to admit every petition. The admissibility of a petition depends on various factors, and the High Courts have the discretion to decide whether to admit a particular case.
By: Kamal Kashyap ProfileResourcesReport error
Armaan Moudgill
Sir the correct option(as marked) and the explanation dont match.
Yes and the appropriate rectification has been made
Access to prime resources
New Courses