send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements about Subsidiary Alliance
1.The Indian rulers had to pay for the “subsidiary forces” to the Company.
2.Indian rulers could keep their independent armed forces along with the subsidiary forces.
3.Awadh was the first state to accept the alliance.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
1 and 2 only
3 only
1, 2 and 3
The Indian rulers had to pay for the "subsidiary forces" to the Company. (Correct)
Indian rulers were not allowed to maintain their independent armed forces along with the subsidiary forces. They had to disband their armies. (Incorrect)
Hyderabad was the first state to accept the subsidiary alliance, not Awadh. (Incorrect)
Therefore, only statement 1 is correct.
By: Kamal Kashyap ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses