send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements regarding Emergency Provisions:
1.Governor’s rule is imposed in Jammu and Kashmir under Article 356 of the Indian constitution.
2.President’s rule under Indian constitution can’t be imposed in the state of Jammu and Kashmir under any circumstances.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Governor's rule in Jammu and Kashmir: While Jammu and Kashmir had a separate provision called "Governor's Rule" under Section 92 of its Constitution, it is similar to President's Rule under Article 356 of the Indian Constitution. The mechanism was replaced by President's Rule in Jammu and Kashmir after the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019.
President's rule in Jammu and Kashmir: After the abrogation of Article 370, President's Rule can indeed be imposed in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir under certain circumstances.
By: Kamal Kashyap ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses