send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statement with respect to the Parliamentary processes:
1.Adjournment sine die is the termination of a sitting of the house without any definite date being fixed for the next sitting.
2.Prorogation is the termination of a session of the house and it can be done only by the speaker.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Statement 1 is correct. Adjournment sine die is indeed the termination of a sitting of the house without any definite date being fixed for the next sitting. It effectively ends the current session.
Statement 2 is incorrect. Prorogation is the termination of a session of the house, but it is not solely done by the Speaker. While the Speaker can recommend prorogation to the President (in the case of the Lok Sabha) or the Governor (in the case of the Rajya Sabha), prorogation is ultimately done by the President or the Governor, as the case may be.
Therefore, the correct option is 1 only.
By: Kamal Kashyap ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses