send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements about the Pitt’s India Act of 1784:
1.It enlarged the powers of the East India Company by giving it full autonomy.
2.The Act subordinated the Bombay and Madras Presidencies to Bengal.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
The statement that the Pitt's India Act of 1784 enlarged the powers of the East India Company by giving it full autonomy is incorrect. The Act did not give the East India Company full autonomy; rather, it introduced certain reforms to regulate and restrict the powers of the Company.
The statement that the Act subordinated the Bombay and Madras Presidencies to Bengal is also incorrect. The Act did not subordinate these presidencies to Bengal but rather created a system of dual government in India, where the Governor-General of Bengal had authority over political and military matters in Bengal, Bihar, and Odisha, while the Bombay and Madras Presidencies retained some autonomy.
So, neither of the statements is correct.
By: Kamal Kashyap ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses