send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements:
1. The Extremists wanted to extend the Swadeshi Movement from boycott to active struggle for taking over the government from British throughout the country.
2. The Extremists also wanted to gradually extend the boycott from foreign goods to every form of association or cooperation with the colonial Government.
3. The Moderates wanted to confine the boycott part of the movement to Bengal and were totally opposed to its extension to the Government.
Which of the above statements is/are true?
1 and 3 Only
1 Only
2 and 3 Only
All of the above
Curzon’s partition of Bengal is considered to be a turning point in the history of the Congress. The partition was devised to gain political benefits. Lord Curzon divided Bengal to break the unity of the Bengali people. Worse than that, he divided Bengal in such a way that Eastern Bengal became a Muslim majority province. The National Congress at once stood to oppose the partition. Mass agitation began and `Vande Mataram’ became the slogan of the nation. Very soon, the movement took a new turn in the name of Swadeshi Movement. It was decided to boycott the British goods. The educated Indians knew of the economic evils of the British rule. The industrial goods of England flooded the Indian markets. Everywhere millions of people used British cloth. In fact, the Indian village and cottage industries died away because of British goods. The nationalists decided to boycott the British goods. People threw away foreign goods and burnt the British cloth. The Swadeshi Movementresulted in a great political awakening. The beginning of an organized movement was a great thing in itself. But, it led to a temporary crisis in the Congress. Some prominent Congress leaders came to believe that India needed a revolutionary movement to fight against the foreign rule. The leader of that school of thought was Bal Gangadhar Tilak. On the other hand, some other prominent leaders believed that political and constitutional concessions should be gained by negotiation with the Government. The leader of that thought was Gopal Krishna Gokhale. The followers of Tilak were described as extremists. The followers of Gokhale were known as moderates. The difference between the two groups became open during the Swadeshi Movement, particularly in the year 1907.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses