send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of these characterizes Judicial Overreach, as different from Judicial Activism or Judicial Review?
Transgression of judiciary into executive or legislative domain
Judiciary passing orders to the executive on a matter of public importance
Judiciary nullifying a Parliamentary law that was passed by due procedure
All of the above
Option A: Judicial Activism is one step ahead of judicial review, and judicial overreach is even ahead of judicial activism. For e.g. many contend that the scrapping of the NJAC Act was an act of Judicial overreach. The personal views of the judges, rather than existing laws, may guide judicial decisions in such cases. And, there is often an attempt to expand judicial boundaries into the legislative or executive domain.
Option B: It is not overreach. For e.g. Mandamus can be issued under A32 of the constitution.
Option C: This is a provision under A13 of the constitution. Laws ultra vires the constitution, even if passed by due procedure, are null and void.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses