send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following about a Joint sitting of the Parliament.
1) The meeting is chaired by the President of India.
2) The Constitution does not mention the term “Joint Sitting”.
3) There can be no joint sitting in case of money bills. Select the Solution using the codes below.
1 and 2 only
2 and 3 only
3 only
1 and 3 only
Statement 1: It is chaired by the Speaker, LS. Also, there are more LS MPs than RS MPs, so the view of LS usually presides over than of the RS.
S2: The constitution does mention the term joint sitting and authorizes the president to summon a joint sitting.
S3: RS has no authority to express disagreement on money bills by sending it back to LS. It can only make recommendations for desired changes, it is the LS whose views preside over a money bill.
Report error
Access to prime resources