send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The historian Barani refused to consider the state in India under Delhi Sultans as truly Islamic because
The majority of the population did not follow Islam
The Muslims theologists were often disregarded
The Sultan supplemented the Muslim law by framing his own regulations
Religious freedom was accorded to non- Muslims
Ziauddin Barani was a historian during reign of Mohammamd Bin Tughlaq and Firoz Shah Tughlaq.
Barani held extreme views on religion and pointed there was no difference between hindu and muslim rulers if jaziya and kharaj were enough for ruler. According to barani, Muslim ruler must wage holy wars. Whereas, the Sultan supplemented the Muslim law by framing his own regulations
By: Kamal Kashyap ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses