send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements.
Assertion (A): If a person’s Right to Vote is infringed, she can move the Election Commission of India for the enforcement of this right.
Reason (R): Right to Vote is a constitutional right guaranteed by the Election Commission of India.
In the context of the above, which of these is correct?
A is correct, and R is an appropriate explanation of A.
A is correct, but R is not an appropriate explanation of A.
A is correct, but R is incorrect.
Both A and R are incorrect.
Right to Vote is a legal right. A lot of controversy arose on the status of Right to Vote, as constitutional or legal right, but all of us settled with UPSC’s interpretation and one of the rulings of SC citing this as a legal right. So, R stands incorrect. Now, when a legal right is infringed, a person can directly move the HCs, and not ECI or SC, because the constitutional guarantees protection of individuals through writs issued by high court in case of infringement of a legal right.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses