send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The Supreme Court has recently ruled that Right to Privacy is a fundamental right. What is/are the consequences of this judgment?
1) Citizens can move both the High Courts and Supreme Court for violation of this right.
2) It reconciles India’s legal position on privacy with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
3) This right will be recognized under the ‘Right to Equality in India pending statutory approval by the Parliament.
Select the Solution using the codes below.
1 and 2 only
2 and 3 only
1 and 3 only
2 only
Statement 1: This is as per A32 and A226 of the constitution under the Right to constitutional remedies.
Statement 2: The Supreme Court of India's judgment gains international significance as privacy enjoys a robust legal framework internationally. It is now aligned with A12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 1966, which legally protects persons against the arbitrary interference with one's privacy, honour and reputation, family, home and correspondence.
Statement 3: It was recognized as an intrinsic part of Right to Life and Personal Liberty under Article 21 and entire Part Ill of the Constitution. Parliament does not recognize FRs different from the constitution.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses