send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements
Select the correct statement.
1 only
2 only
Both
None
Article 212 of the Constitution provides for Courts not to inquire into proceedings of the Legislature –
Therefore, the Courts cannot interfere at interim stage of proceedings or interfere to decide questions of disqualification under the anti-defection law. (same was observed in Kihoto Hollohan case). Hence both statements are correct.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Sushank Saini
Statement 1 is ambiguous.We it says "courts can not interfere....." it implies that court can "never" interfere (which is false) but had the statement read like this "court can not interfere untill the presiding officer has made a decision" only then it woupd be considered correct.
Access to prime resources
New Courses