please see and explain why the second option is not correct

Ceding a territory would be different from settling a boundary dispute as per SC Judgment from 1969. Boundary can be settled by executive action only and doesn’t need constitutional amendment. So 2 only should be the correct answer.

In Laxmikanth Book, Page No.-- 5.3 there is statement that says " SC in 1969 ruled that, settlement of boundary dispute between Indian and Any another country does not require a constitutional amendment but can be done by Executive Action "

Sarthak Hans

Rectified

0 0 reply

In Laxmikanth Book, Page No.-- 5.3 there is statement that says " SC in 1969 ruled that, settlement of boundary dispute between Indian and Any another country does not require a constitutional amendment but can be done by Executive Action "

corrected

Wrong option is showed as correct

please check

Second statement is correct as per Laxmikant . In 100 amendment net area was ceded to Bangladesh , hence the amendment plz clarify

Option 2 settlement of boundary dispute does not require constitutional amendments it can be done by executive action as long as does not involve cession of territory to foreign country .As was case of 100th land boundary agreement where boundary changes were involved for schedule 1 hence amendment.

But in case of 100th amendment territory was ceded in order to resolve dispute hence the amendment

2nd is correct,

sc ruled that,sttlment of boundary dispute btwn inida and other country do no require CAA

abhimanu admin

Kindly refer the source of content

0 0 reply

100th constitutional ammendement is contradictory to second statement being right so option has to be none of theabove please rectify

abhimanu admin

Rectified

0 0 reply

amendment requires for settle boundary dispute ... 100th amendment

abhimanu admin

Rectified

0 0 reply