send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Supreme Court has given a verdict on mercy killing in connection with the case of a former nurse, Aruna Shanbaug, who has been lying in a Mumbai KEM hospital since she was brutally raped in 1973.
Consider the following statements:
1. Prior to recent Supreme Court verdict both passive euthanasia and active euthanasia were illegal.
2. After Supreme Court verdict in Aruna Shaunbaug case both passive euthanasia and active euthanasia have been made legal but with some riders.
Which of the given statements is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
1 and 2
None of the above
2nd statement is incorrect. Supreme Court allowed passive euthanasia in India not active euthanasia.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses