send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Context
The preliminary hearings at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) seeking guarantees of basic protection for Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslims offer only symbolic hope to the community.
Plight of Rohingyas
Camps – thousands of Rohingyas are forcibly exiled in refugee camps in Bangladesh. It is necessary to demand accountability from Yangon.
OIC – Gambia, on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, brought the case pertaining to genocide in 2017 committed by the Myanmarese military.
Armed Forces – The forces have insisted that their actions were in response to the armed insurgency by the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army.
UN highlights Human Rights – The UN and several rights groups have documented orchestrated incidents of torched villages, mass rape and other atrocities by the military, forcing over 700,000 Rohingya to flee to Bangladesh.
Citizenship rights – Rohingya in Myanmar’s Rakhine state are particularly vulnerable due to the denial of citizenship and the reference by nationalist sections to them as illegal Bengali immigrants.
Suu Kyi – She asserted that the Army had acted proportionately in countering the rebels and accused Gambia of misrepresenting the situation.
Lack of testimony – the absence of an explicit reference to the Rohingya in her testimony is condemned. She has even been accused of choosing to argue the defence in person with an eye on the 2020 general election.
Arguments
Not genocide – Lawyers representing Myanmar said that, though violent crimes were committed during the conflict, motives of genocide against the community could not be imputed against the authorities.
The ICJ has handed down guilty verdicts in a few cases relating to crimes of genocide. It didn’t pin the blame directly upon states as in the 2007 ruling on the Bosnian war of the preceding decade.
Proof of genocide – The challenges of establishing conclusive proof of the intention to extirpate entire communities underlies this caution.
The decision regarding genocide relating to the atrocities against the Rohingya is not expected immediately.
Way ahead
The more urgent concern before the court is Gambia’s petition seeking an injunction that the violence against the community cease forthwith and the government guarantee immediate protection.
By: VISHAL GOYAL ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses