send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which one of the following is the correct association?
Indira Sawhney Case: Basic structure of the Constitution
Minerva Mills Case: Invocation of Article 356
Maneka Gandhi Case: Just, fair and reasonable procedure of law
Pondyal vs. Union of India Case: Financial Emergency
In A K Gopalan vs State of Madras case Apex court took narrow view of article 21 and held that Article 21 has no relationship with Article 14 and 19 and said that personal liberty has nothing to do with rights given in article 19, which talks about different type of liberty and also held that article 14 which talks about reasonableness has also no relationship with Article 21. Apex court made literal interpretation of procedure establish by law.
In Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India case supreme court took broad view and held that there is the formation of golden triangle amongst article 14 19, and 21. Apex court held that procedure must be fair just and reasonable.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses