send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Under which of the following circumstances people can directly approach to the guardian of Fundamental Rights i.e. Supreme Court of India:
1. Violation of Fundamental Rights by State
2. Arbitrary levy and/or collection of tax without the authority of law
3. Restriction on free movement of Trade commerce and intercourse throughout territory of India
4. Certain imposition of restrictions by state on freedom of religion
5. Certain imposition of taxes by state on promotion of culture
Which of above statements is/are correct?
1, 2 and 3
All except 3
1, 4 and 5
All are correct
Article 265 of the Constitution of India states that no tax shall be levied or collected without an authority of law. 2nd statement is incorrect because it is not Fundamental Right. 3rd option is incorrect because restriction on free movement of Trade commerce and intercourse throughout territory of India does not falls under the preview of Supreme Court of India. It is not a Fundamental Right also. Article 301 deals with the freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses