Explanation:

• The nature of Peasant movements after the revolt of 1857 and until the end of the 19th century witnessed  a certain shift.
• The princes, chiefs and landlords had been crushed or co-opted and peasants emerged as the main force in agrarian movements. They now fought directly for their own demands, centered almost wholly on economic issues, and against their immediate enemies, foreign planters and indigenous zamindaris and moneylenders. Their struggles were directed towards specific and limited objectives and redressal of particular grievances. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
• The territorial reach of these movements was also limited. They were confined to particular localities with no mutual communication or linkages. They also lacked continuity of struggle or long-term organization. Once the specific objectives of a movement were achieved, its organization, as also peasant solidarity  built around it, dissolved and disappeared. Thus, the Indigo strike, the Pabna agrarian leagues and the social-boycott movement of the Deccan ryots left behind no successors. Hence, statement 2 is not correct.
• A major weakness of the peasant movements was the lack of an adequate understanding of colonialism, colonial economic structure and the colonial state. Nor did the 19th century peasants possess a new ideology and a new social, economic and political programme based on an analysis of the newly constituted colonial society. Their struggles, however militant, occurred within the framework of the old societal order. Hence, statement 3 is not correct.