send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
"Our foreign policy towards Japan is based on economic complementarities and developing strategic convergences. In August 2002, both countries agreed on a Global Partnership in the 21st century, at a time when economic sanctions imposed by Japan on India following our nuclear tests of May 1998 were still in force. During her visit, Japanese Foreign Minister Kawaguchi spoke of Japan’s strategic partnership with India and India’s pivotal role in the vision to create a pan-pan Asianomic area extending from East to South Asia. In the second quarter of 2002, Japan, Korea, China and India were between the second, fourth, sixth and eighth largest importers of oil in the world. India’s achievements in the software sector and those of the East Asian countries in the hardware sector offer natural synergies that are currently in the process of being jointly exploited to mutual benefit. India and Japan are also candidates for permanent membership of the UN Security Council.”
The relationship between India and Japan makes good strategic sense as they bring together Asia’s largest and Asia’s richest democracies. It brings together two states who share a similarly strained relationship with China: economic dependence combined with strategic distrust. For India, Japan is a critical source of capital and commercial technology and sees Japan as a natural and indispensable partner in our quest for stability and peace in the vast Indo-Pacific region.
For a politically rising Japan that is beginning to shed its pacifist blinkers, India is central to both its economic-revival and security-building strategies. After prolonged economic stagnation, Japan faces difficult challenges, including a shrinking population, a spiralling public debt, a fundamentally deflationary environment, and a security dilemma compounded by constraints arising from the U.S.-imposed, post-war Constitution.
The tragedy of Cold War great power politics kept the two countries apart through the latter half of the 20th century, and on the economic front, things were timed poorly - Japan’s bubble burst just as India liberalized its economy. Late-1990s proved transformative in Japan’s relationship with India. After the Pokhran-II nuclear tests in May 1998, Japan condemned India and participated in the international sanctions regime against it. The relationship entered its contemporary phase of growth and normalization beginning with Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori’s visit to India in 2000.
The importance of Japan for India can be gauged by the fact that Japan is the only Asian country and second in the world - Russia being the other one - with which India has had an institutionalized system of annual summits since 2006. With Russia, India has been having annual summits since 2000.
Abe’s return to the helm boded quite well for India; he is known to be quite fond of India, and a strong proponent of improved strategic ties with the country. His strategic vision of the Asia-Pacific imagines India and Japan at the “Confluence of the Two Seas” bridging the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Indeed, negotiations on a nuclear deal resumed this year, but are still a long way from concluding.
The Civil Nuclear Cooperation agreement will ultimately work out for India and Japan. Much of this cooperation has been possible because, on most issues, Indian and Japanese policymakers act with strategic pragmatism. The nuclear issue, ultimately, is a clash of values. Despite the optimism present in both states with regard to the future of the India-Japan strategic partnership, there is a great need to reconcile this fundamental difference in values.
India’s ‘Look East’ policy posited Japan as a key partner. Japan and India, as energy-poor countries heavily reliant on oil imports from the unstable Persian Gulf region, are seriously concerned over mercantilist efforts to assert control over energy supplies and the transport routes for them. So the maintenance of a peaceful and lawful maritime domain, including unimpeded freedom of navigation, is critical to their security and economic well-being. That is why they have moved from emphasizing shared values to seeking to protect shared interests, including by holding joint naval exercises.
In addition to the above challenges, there is uncertainty about the future of the Japan- India relationship after Prime Ministers Abe and Modi step down from office, since it was under their strong leadership that the relationship gained so much momentum. As long as China keeps up its assertiveness, Japan and India are likely to continue deepening their strategic relationship.
A challenge for India is to correct the lopsided trade and calibrate China’s market access to progress on bilateral political, territorial and water disputes, or else Beijing will fortify its leverage against India. After all, China does not shy away from making efforts to block the rise of India and Japan, including by stepping up military pressure on them and opposing the expansion of the UN Security Council’s permanent membership.
People to people contacts between India and Japan need to increase further. There are very few Indian students studying in Japan as compared from China. Clearly, Japan needs to make its universities and institutions of higher learning more attractive to Indian students. Interaction between the two countries has largely remained at the intergovernmental level.
Japan has dragged India to the World Trade Organisation’s Dispute settlement body for adopting safeguard measures on imports of iron and steel products.
India has imposed minimum import price (MIP) on imports of certain iron and steel products. India argued that it has imposed MIP due to growing imports from steel surplus countries like China, Japan and Korea with predatory prices which is badly hurting the domestic industry since Sept 2014.
The India-Japan Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy entered into force on July 20, 2017.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses