send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
History of the fight against Tobacco
It is ten years since U.S. Congress passed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, but now, the Food and Drug Administration issued a rule that pictorial warnings be carried on cigarette packages and advertisements.
At present, cigarette packages in the U.S. carry only text warnings and only on one side.
Canada was the first to introduce pictorial warnings on cigarette packets in 2001.
By 2018, 118 countries had implemented such warnings in line with the World Health Organisation’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control that came into force in 2005.
Importance of messaging
Dut to their small size and placement, text warnings remain invisible and fail to convey the harmful effects of smoking.
Gory pictures are very likely to be noticed, leave a lasting impression of the varied risks of smoking.
They also convey the central message immediately and easily.
A 2017 study based on modeling found that pictorial warnings could reduce the prevalence of smoking in the U.S by 5% by 2020 and up to 10% by 2065.
Data from countries that introduced pictorial warnings show how powerful they can be.-
In Canada, there was a 12% relative reduction in smoking prevalence in 6 years after graphic images were made mandatory.
Australia witnessed more than a 10% drop in prevalence between 2004 and 2008.
The U.K. saw a 10% relative decline in 2009, just a year after image warnings were introduced.
Challenges to a stricter tobacco law – lessons from the USA
Stiff opposition from the tobacco industry on the ground that graphic images violate rights protecting free speech.
The biggest threat that pictorial warnings pose to tobacco companies is in reducing the appeal and consumption of tobacco.
About 30% of young adults in 28 European countries and Canada reported that graphic images made them less likely to start smoking.
CONCLUSION
Pictorial warnings can turn the power of packaging — far from brand building, packages with graphic images will become a mobile medium to spread public health messages at no cost to the government.
By: VISHAL GOYAL ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses