send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements:
The Supreme Court judgement and S.R. Bommai vs Union of India has been interpreted to mean that the Governor can dismiss a Council of Ministers or the Chief Minister
1. At his pleasure on his subjective estimate of the strength of the Chief Minister in the Assembly
2. When the Legislative Assembly has expressed its want of confidence in the Council of Ministers
3. When a measures of the Council of Ministers has been defeated on the floor of the Assembly 4. When a censure motion against the Council of Ministers has been rejected in the Legislative Assembly. Which of the statement(s) given about is/are correct?
3. When a measures of the Council of Ministers has been defeated on the floor of the Assembly
4. When a censure motion against the Council of Ministers has been rejected in the Legislative Assembly.
Which of the statement(s) given about is/are correct?
1 and 2
2 and 3
1 and 3
3 and 4
1st and 4th statements are incorrect. Bommai v. Union of India. S. R. Bommai v. Union of India was a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India, where the Court discussed at length provisions of Article 356 of the Constitution of India and related issues. The first and most important question which the Supreme Court had to determine was whether the Presidential Proclamation under Article 356 was justiciable and if so to what extent. The second contention was whether the President has unfettered powers to issue Proclamation under Article 356(1) of the Constitution.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses