send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
With reference to Ancient India, according to Manu
1. Father could not give his wealth to daughter as a gift.
2. Mother’s wealth would pass to the daughters.
3. Women could receive wealth in Adhyavahanika.
Select the correct answer using the codes below.
1 only
2&3 only
3 only
All the above
Statement 1: Manu did not project that daughters are not the natural heirs of their fathers, but the father was at liberty to give wealth to daughter as gift. Manu also refers to the putrika or daughter’s son functioning as an heir for a sonless father. Statement 2: The mother’s wealth would pass to the daughters, according to the MS.The different occasions in the MS when gifts can be given to the daughter, over which she has right were:Adhyagni – before the nuptial fire;Adhyavahanika – in the bridal procession;Pritidatta – out of love; Bhratrimatripitripraptam- received from brother, mother, father.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses