send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following statements is/are correct?
Select the correct answer using the codes given below
Only1
Only2
Both 1 and2
Neither 1 nor2
According to Article 32, when an individual feels that he has been “unduly deprived” of his fundamental rights, he can move the Supreme Court and seek justice. Apart from the Supreme Court, the High Courts also have the power to protect fundamental rights. Like the apex court, they also can issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights of the citizens. The both courts can issue five different writs - Certiorari, Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, and Quo Warranto.
The Article is included in Part III of the Constitution with other fundamental rights including to Equality, Freedom of Speech and Expression, Life and Personal Liberty, and Freedom of Religion. Only if any of these fundamental rights is violated can a person can approach the Supreme Court directly under Article 32. Each High Court has power to issue to any person within its jurisdiction directions, orders, or writs including writs which are in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari for enforcement of Fundamental Rights and for any other purpose.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Rupesh raj
statement 2 : hc can issue writs for other cases also.
It is correct
Ravi shankar
Option 3 would be the right answer that is 1 and 2 both are correct
corrected
ASWIN S S
Writ jurisdiction of high court is wider than supreme court. Supreme court can issue writs only for the enforcement of fundamental rights, while high court can issue writs for enforcement of fundamental right and other purpose. hence statement 2 becomes wrong as it says both sc and hc can issue writs ONLY for enforcement of fundamental rights.
Access to prime resources
New Courses