send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The Constitution of India guarantees freedom of thought and expression to all its citizens subject to
Reasonable restrictions in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India,
Reasonable restrictions in the interest of security of the state,
Reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order, decency and morality
Reasonable restrictions in the interest of Implementation of Directive Principles
Choose the correct one
l and 2only
2 and 3only
1only
l, 2, and 3
The Grounds on Which This Freedom Could Be Restricted
Clause (2) of Article 19 of the Indian constitution imposes certain restrictions on free speech under following heads:
Security Of The State,
Friendly Relations With Foreign States
Public Order,
Decency And Morality,
Contempt Of Court,
Defamation,
Incitement To An Offence, And
Sovereignty And Integrity Of India.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Deepanshu Kohli
the question highlighted acc to constitution, and no where in constitution, there is mention that FRs can be restricted to implement DPSPs, rather it was provided in Minerva Mills case, kindly clarify this
the question highlighted acc to constitution, and no where in constitution, there is mention that FRs can be restricted to implement DPSPs, rather it was provided in Minerva Mills case
corrected
kavita
Point 4 is not correct therefore correct response should be option a
Fundamental rights in general can be restricted to implement DPSPs , D is correct
Aman kumar
its related to fundamental rights
answer is correct , but the question is refined
Access to prime resources
New Courses