send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Gender is one of the crucial dimensions behind inequalities in the form and extent of work and political participation, levels of education, state of health, representation in decision making bodies, access to property etc. Hence, due to certain socio-cultural factors the economic and political roles of women have reminded mostly unrecognised. In the society they are marginalised and economically discriminated against.
Ironically, in the Indian situation where women goddesses are worshipped, women are denied an independent identity and status. This is strongly ingrained in the social fabric, the culture, the economy and the polity. As the code of Manu states: ‘a woman should never be independent. Her father has authority over her in childhood, her husband in youth, and her son in old age.’ (Manusmriti, Dharmashastra,IX, 3). Women‘s identity, freedom, access to resources, opportunities, etc., are determined by the caste and class status of the family.
The first ideas on sex role, or as we would prefer to put it, gender role differences, which a child acquires, is that of women of other families marrying and leaving their homes to live with different groups of people.
Men appear to exercise far greater influence in decision-making and are far more visible and audible than their wives.
Most of the tasks within the home are done by the mother, grandmother, sisters and so on. All these tasks, which consume time and energy, are not counted as ‘work’ or ‘employment’ and there is no payment involved.
Indian tradition mainly perpetuates the perceptions of women’s primary role as the homemaker and not as the brad winner. Such a view ignores the realities of millions of women in the poorer sections in rural and urban areas, who work for the survival of the family. Millions of rural women work hard on family farms and within the home as unpaid workers collect fuel, fodder and water, work as artisans, craftworkers (weaving, cane and bamboo works etc.) with their men but are recognised as helpers and not as workers. When they work as wage labourers they are invariably paid less wages than men. The Government passed the Equal Remuneration Act (1976), however, it remains ineffective
The neglect of women’s economic roles results in exploitation of women workers, unequal wages between men and women, higher unemployment, due to loss of jobs in traditional sectors like textiles, mining, manufacturing and household industries.
The continued absence of concern for women’s economic roles till the Sixth Five Year Plan shows that women’s economic independence was given a low priority. Apart from this the nature of economic independence was given a low priority. Apart from this the nature of economic development in the post-Independence India benefited only a small section of urban educated middle and upper class women whose visibility as legislators, administrators, doctors, lawyers, teachers etc. led to an erroneous belief that women have made great strides and have achieved equality.
The report of the Committee on the Status of Women in India (1974) was a watershed in the debate on women’s issues in India. The Committee provided evidence of the decline in women’s employment due to technological changes, biases on the part of employers to ‘replace women by men and machines’. High illiteracy among women particularly among Scheduled Castes and Tribes and poor rural and urban women, coupled with inadequate training facilities for women.
Several women leaders who had actively participated in the freedom movement, occupied important positions in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha (the two houses of Parliament), state legislatures, became governors, chief ministers, cabinet ministers held and other position within major political parties. Indira Gandhi became the Prime Minister. Despite the prominent and high visibility of a few women at all levels of political leadership women remain underrepresented. Their number has never gone beyond 7 per cent in the Lok Sabha or State Assemblies.
One of the weaknesses in the political strategies of women’s organisations in the 50s and 60s was their inability to mobilise ordinary women and issues, which concerned them. The lack of efforts to reach to the masses and expand the base of women’s movement limited its effectiveness and agenda for action. The position of peasant and working class women deteriorated and only a small minority of women benefited.
Problems faced by women are regarded as one form of Violence or the other against women. It refers to ‘force, whether overt or convert, used to wrest from a woman something that she does not want to give of her own free will and which causes her either physical injury or emotional trauma or both’.
Violence against women may be categorised as :
Rape is a violent sexual intercourse performed against the will and consent of the woman. It demonstrates a power relationship between men and women. Rape diminishes the identity of the woman as an individual and objectifies her. In India, atrocities and crimes on women are increasing so is the incidence of rape. Every two hours, a rape occurs somewhere in India. Rape, sexual harassment, eve-teasing, molestation and abuse of women/young girls by men limit women’s freedom and perpetuate the notion that women need male protection at various stages in life. Sexual harassment and abuse at the workplace is least challenged or reported for fear of losing employment and stigmatization.
It is futile to argue that provocative dresses worn by women are responsible for sexual harassment or molestation. In many cases saree and salwar kameez clad women have been sexually harassed. It is the scant regard for women, which is responsible for sexual harassment of women besides their being regarded as commodities with no feeling, to be played with.
Paradoxically in our society, the victims of rape get stigmatised in the society. The woman who is the victim of rape is blamed because, the notion is that, “she must have invited it”, “she perhaps was dressed provocatively” etc.Excepting in a few cases most acts of rape are not outbursts of perversions. There are several forms of rape:
a) Rape within the family (e.g. incest rape, child sex abuse and rape by the husband, which is not legally accepted as rape);
b) Rape as caste/class domination (e.g. rape by upper caste men of lower caste women; rape of landless/agriculturallabourers/bonded labourers by landlords etc.);
c) Rape of children, minors and unprotected young women;
d) Gang rapes during wars, communal riots and political upheavals;
e) Custodial rapes (e.g. in police custody, remand homes, in hospitals, at the work place etc.);
f) Stray, unpremeditated rapes.
The major rape incidents in Mathura and Maharashtra, and or Ramazabee in Hyderabad, in the police custody, and the court verdicts in these cases which acquitted the policemen on the clause of ‘consent’, led to a nation wide campaign for reform of Rape Law. A change was brought by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983. A man is said to commit rape if he has sexual intercourse with a woman without her consent, or with her consent, but having obtained it in a state of insanity or intoxication or by putting her or any person in whom she is interested in fear of death or of hurt or when she is below sixteen years of age. The Act also introduced categories of custodial rape. In any case of custodial rape, if the victim gives evidence that she did not consent to sexual intercourse, the court would assume that she did not consent. The onus of proving that rape was not committed will be on the man. However, the aspect of going into the details of past sexual history of the woman, in order to accept or reject the charge of rape has been left untouched. That is, the law sets standards of morality for protection of women.
Violence on women in the family in the form of wife beating, ill treatment, emotional torture and the like, were considered family ‘problems’ and never acknowledged as crimes against women. It has been observed that domestic violence is prevalent in all classes of the society. The extreme form of this violence on young brides came to be known as ‘dowry deaths’ or ‘bride burning’ cases.
In most of the bride burning or dowry death or dowry murder cases the insatiable demands of the in-laws of the daughter, which cannot be met by her parents, is the main reason. In the case of suicides committed by the brides, it is proximately by the harassment and torture of the bride at the hands of her in-laws/husband and remotely by the expenses involved in the upkeep of the daughter with or without her children by her parents and the patriarchal izzat (honour which it is felt by the bride’s parents that the staying of their daughters in their natal family after marriage would tarnish their reputation and status in society) for which the bride’s parents are not willing to accept their daughter back.
Keeping this is mind the social activists and feminists have been demanding the right of a daughter in parental property both ancestral and self-acquired. This, it is, felt would mitigate the dowry death or dowry murder menace. As economic security for a bride is of the utmost importance like the emotional and moral support of her parents and relatives.
The existence, prevalence and ramifications of the practice of dowry are alarming. The incidence of dowry deaths, which is in the increase in several cities, metropolitans and small towns, was noticed by women’s groups and there was a demand for an amendment in the Dowry Act during the early 1980s. Female foetuses are systematically aborted in North India and in Western India with the aid of Amniocentesis (a sex detection test) in order to avoid the future payment of dowry at the time of marriage.
It has been observed that the practice of dowry came into existence with hypergamy, i.e., a marriage between a lower caste woman and an upper caste man. The concept of ‘stridhan’, the share in property which women received at time of marriage was slowly replaced by offering dowry by the bride’s family to the greeom’s family. Instead of a share in landed (immovable) property, dowry is generally in the form of cash or kind on which young brides rarely have control. The growth of consumerism, i.e., the want to acquire consumer items like T.V., video, scooter, refrigerator etc., among the middle class has led further to the demand of dowry. This practice in now moving into the lower classes and non-Hindu communities where earlier it was non-existent. The prevalent notion about dowry is that it is compensation to the groom’s family for taking over the responsibility of the woman’s sustenance. This notion thrives on the assumption that a woman is a ‘non-working’ person and marriage entails the transfer of this ‘burden’ of maintaining a ‘non-working’ person and marriage entails the transfer of this ‘burden’ of maintaining a ‘non-working’ person from the bride’s family to groom’s family. This notion is incorrect because (a) it undermines the multiple roles women play as housewives and mothers, and (b) does not explain why even employed women are expected to give dowry.
In Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, prohibits indecent representation of women through advertisements or in publications, writings, painting, and figures or in any other manner, and for matters connected or incidental thereto.
However, pornographic literature, magazines, pictures, hoarding and films are published/printed which are seen as upholding the ‘right to freedom of expression’, in actuality violate woman’s dignity. In turn these create and perpetuate patriarchal images of ‘strong’, ‘aggressive’, ‘violent’, and chauvinistic men on the one hand, and ‘meek’, ‘submissive’, ‘vulnerable’ women as sex objects on the other hand. These images are utilised in advertisements, like cosmetics, fabrics, domestic gadgets and various other commodities, for commercial gains. A woman is projected as sexy and enticing and the man as macho, violent and independent. The films too utilize a similar formula. There are pressure groups that protest from time to time against pornography and he misrepresentation of women in the media.
Some women’s organisations provide counseling, legal aid and run support centres and short stay homes or women in distress. However, it is essential to reverse viewing women as ‘expendable’, ‘dispensable’ commodities and greater support for women should come forth from the community, neighborhood and her parents.
There is need to question the extraordinary value placed by parents and society on marriage and the pressure on women to-be-married-at-any-cost. The perpetuation of the practice of dowry undervalues women and make daughter unwelcome. The choice to remain ‘single’ (unmarried) should be respected and valued. Single women living alone or with the parental family should be nurtured as a ‘norm’ rather than a ‘deviance’.
Prostitution devalues women’s dignity and stigmatises her as a ‘fallen’ woman in the society. The commodisation of woman’s sexuality begins with the subordination of women. Women’s identity as an individual is undermined by the objectification of her sexuality and the sale of sexual experience. In the urban context, where single male migration from rural areas is high the business of prostitution is rampant. In 1986, the earlier SITA Act was amended to prevent trafficking in prostitution. However, the new Immoral Traffic in Persons Prevention Act (ITPPA) has similar aims, objectives, logic and premises.
The ITPPA, however, continues to be biased against the prostitute. The clauses penalizing the prostitute are retained. Simultaneously, the client is not made an offender.
The position and role of women in India has varied in different periods and in different classes, religion and ethnic groups. By 19th century there were several evil social practices like Sati (burning of widow on the funeral pyre of her husband), child marriage, ban on widow remarriage, polygamy etc. which were a matter of debate.
During the British rule the spread of English education and Western liberal ideology among Indians and spread of Christianity and missionary activities, resulted in a number of movements for social change and religious reform in the 19th century.
The broad objectives of these movements were caste reform, improvement in the status of women, promoting women’s education and an attack on various social practices whose roots lay in social and legal inequalities and religious traditions of different communities.
In the earlier phase of the social reform movement during 19th century, the initiatives came largely from male reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Roy. The issues that were taken up by them were Sati, ill treatment of widows, ban on widow remarriage, polygyny, and child marriage and denial of property rights to women and the need to educate women. Struggle for women’s education initiated by men resulted in setting up of women’s schools, colleges, hostels, protection homes etc. The social reformers ‘ assumptions were that female education would revitalise the family system, which was threatened by the increasing communication gap between educated men and their uneducated wives. The social reform movement saw the emergence of women’s organisations and institutions. However, the movement was led by men and originated in metropolitan cities.
This period has witnessed the proliferation of various organisation. These organisations took the lead to project important issues, which adversely affected the status of women in the society. The most important of these organisations where the Brahmo Samaj, Prarthana Samaj, Arya Samaj. But these organisations were maily led by male but were organisations for women emancipation apart from other objectives of reforms.
It was founded by Raja Ram Mohan Roy in 1825, and attempted to remove restrictions and prejudices against women, which had their roots in religion. These included child marriage, polygyny, limited right to inherit property and seclusion of women. Education of women was seen as the major instrument to improve women’s position. Keshab Chadra Sen stressed the need for educating women at home and government support was sought for this purpose. A women’s magazine called Bamabodhini Patrika was started. An intercaste marriage was also solemnised under the auspices of the Brahmo Samaj. Opposition to such moves from Hindu orthodoxy resulted in the passing of Civil Marriage Act, 1872. This Act, which permitted inhercaste marriage and divorce, fixed 14 and 18 as he minimum age of marriage for girls and boys respectively.
The influence of the Brahmo Samaj was confined to Bengal and North India.
It was founded in 1867 and had more or less similar objectives as Brahmo Samaj. However, it remained confined to western India. M.G. Ranade and Bhandarkar were the leading figures. In 1869 the Bombay Widow Reforms Association was formed which arranged the first widow remarriage in 1869. Two leaders of the Prarthana Samaj - R.G. Bhandarkar and N.G. Chandravarkar - later become Vice-chancellors of the first Women’s University set up by Karve in 1916 in Bombay. This was later named as the SNDT Women’s University.
Both these movements stressed women’s education to bridge the widening gap between males who had the benefit of modern education and women of the family.
The idea was to make them better wives and mothers. The debate on women’s education that raged in 19th and early 20th centuries shows that it did not originate from the influences of Western education only. Other reformers also stressed the need for women’s education.
Both these movements were the outcome of the reaction of urban, western educated men aimed to change women’s position within the family.
The Arya Samaj was founded by Dayanand Sarswati in 1875. Unlike the above two movements the Arya Samaj was a religious revivalist movement. While rejecting Hindu religious orthodoxy, idol workship and the caste society, the slogan of this movement was back to the vedic period. They painted a glorious position of women in ancient India. It advocated reform in the caste system, compulsory education for both men and women, prohibition of child marriage by law, remarriage of child widows. It was totally opposed to divorce and widow remarriage in general, and emphasised separate school for girls and boys. Several Arya Kanya Pathshalas were set up which later become colleges and contributed to the cause of women’s education. Though mainly an urban movement, its influence also extended to semi-urban and rural areas. While they rejected the caste system they never demanded its abolition. Pattern of arranged marriage within the caste group and emphasis on home-making roles of women, limited its contribution to the cause of women’s emancipation.
Social reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Ray, Ranade and Dayanand, eulogised the position of women in ancient India. However, the radicals like Ishwarchandra Vidyasagar, Jyotrao Phule and Lokhitvadi Gopal Hari Deshmukh attacked the caste system, which they said was responsible for the subjugation of women. Phule said that Sudras and women had been denied education so that they would not understand the importance of human rights of equality and freedom and would accept the low position accorded to them in law, custom and traditions.
Similar movements began within the Islamic community in the late 19th century. However, emphasis on Purdah system and slow spread of education among women delayed the development of a progressive movement to improve the opportunities for Muslim women. People like Begum of Bhopal, Syed Ahmad Khan and Sheikh Abdullah in Aligarh and Karmat Hussain in Lucknow, spearheaded a movement to improve women’s education. In 1916 Begum of Bhopal formed the All-India Muslim Women’s Conference. The traditionalists disapproved such activities and were enraged by the resolution passed by the Muslim Women’s Conference in 1917 that polygamy should be abolished. In the later years several Muslim women joined the nationalist struggle and non-cooperation movement against the British.
Similar movements also emerged among other communities in different regions.
A few women leaders like Pandita Ramabai and Vidyagouri Neelkant faced bitter opposition for marrying out of caste or obtaining education.
All these movements had a very limited perspective of changing the position women within the family without challenging the social structure and caste inequalities, which perpetuated women’s lower position. Their appeal was limited to urban middle class. The gender bias of the reform movement was most pronounced in the argument that education would improve women’s efficiency as housewives and mothers. Gender equality was not on their agenda
The movement was not conceived as a radical onslaught on the religious orthodoxy, which subjugated women. Social reformers viewed women’s question as a social problem.
In the post Independence period a series of institutional initiative has been introduced for the emancipation of women in the society. The most important of these have been that of the constitutional provisions and social legislation for women and planned economic development. Women’s movement has been widely influenced by these broad socio-economic and political processes of this period. Let us examine briefly a few important aspects of these processes and the way they have affected women’s movement in the independent India.
The Constitution of independent India followed the basic principle of women’s equality as accepted in the Fundamental Rights Resolution of the Karachi Congress. The provision of Article 15(3), which empowered the state to make special provisions for women and children, suggests that there was a realisation of women’s disadvantaged position and the need for the state to enact special measures to bring them at par with men.
During freedom movement it was felt that with the nation’s Independence many of the disabilities, and problems of women attributed to colonial rule, would disappear. The national government undertook to remove the legal disabilities suffered by women and initiated major reforms in Hindu family laws. The legal reforms in the 1950s sought to provide greater rights to Hindu women in marriage, inheritance and guardianship. However, they failed to bridge the gap between legal and social realities. Similar change sin the family laws of other communities like Muslims, Christians, Parsis and Jews, could not be taken up due to political resistance despite the Directive Principle of State Policy clearly stating the need for uniform laws for all the communities.
With these legislative measures in the fifties women’s organisation became passive and lost the vigour shown during the pre-Independence period. Several of these organisation received government grants and their activities were shaped by the grants they received for activities like adult education, nutrition programmes for children, tailoring classes under vocational training programmes and family planning programmes. Most of these organisations were urban-based and the leadership come from the educated middle and upper class women.
In the post-Independence period, two important organisations for rural women wee set up i.e. Kasturba Memorial Trust and Bhartiya Grameen Mahila Sangh (Indian Rural Women’s Organisation). Their main objective was to assist rural women in developing leadership potential.
The main thrust of development policies for women was provision of education, health and welfare.
1970s was marked by a resurgence of women’s struggle and emergence of new women’s groups and organisations. After their participation in nation’s independence struggle women again withdrew from public life and the debate on women’s issues also faded out from the public arena. Several scholars have talked about the absence of a women’s movement in the 50s and 60s in India and the slow erosion of concern for women’s issues. The growth of ‘protest politics’ and breaking out of a limited perspective of legislation and education as the main instrument for improving women’s position, marked the women’s movement in the 70s. Even the older women’s organisations set up during the pre-Independence or during the 50s which were mainly engaged in ‘welfare’ and ‘charity’ work gradually started changing their stand on several issues concerning women.
However, many women activists who were working with political parties, trade unions, peasant and workers movements realised that these were hesitant to take up issues which concerned women as women. The issues women raised were the retrenchment of women from textile mills and other industries due to technological changes and replacing them by men who received training on new machines, lack of maternity benefit to women workers, lack of provision of children at work place, wage discrimination between men and women, inadequate education and training facilities for women workers and discrimination in work places. These led to the emergence of separate women’s organisations in various parts of the country, which seriously attempted to organise poor women for change.
The growing economic hardships of poor rural and urban women (50 per cent of the households were below poverty level at the end of the VI Five Year Plan) and failure to take up women’s issues by the general agrarian and industrial workers’ movements resulted in women labourers, organising separately.
Some new organisations concerned with the plight of women workers in the unorganised sector such as Self-Employment Women’s Association (Gurajat), Working Women’s Forum (Tamil Nadu), Sramil Mahila Sangathna (Maharashtra), also emerged. Organising women labour and taking up the issues of their wages, working conditions, exploitation and health hazards became an important task for these women’s organisations. Research on women in the unorganised sector helped in developing new strategies for dealing with the problems of poor rural and urban workers.
Anti-price rise movement in 1973-74 was a united front of women’s organisations belonging to several parties.
In the late seventies several women’s organisations emerged which were not affiliated to political parties or to trade unions. They were called ‘autonomous women’s organisations’. They rejected the ‘welfarist’ approach adopted by the previous women’s organisations, many of which were set up during the pre-Independence period, and adopted ‘protest-politics’ for mobilising women on specific issues.
Economic hardships faced by women in the Himalayan region due to cutting down of forests, resulted in spontaneous mobilisation of women. They hugged the trees to prevent the contractors from felling them. This is popularly known as Chipko movement. Since the disappearance of forests meant acute hardships to women who are primarily responsible for the collection of fuel, fodder, fruits, herbs for medicine and other forest produce which give them income and employment, women were in the forefront of these ecological agitations.
The ineffectiveness of social legislation at reform is clearly indicated by several studies in the 70s. The autonomous women’s organisations’ took up issues related to women’s oppression like dowry, violence within he family, alcoholism among men and wife-beating, discrimination at the work place etc. to mobilise women for collective action. For the first time some groups in Bombay, Delhi, Hyderabad, Patna etc. raised issues such as sexual exploitation of poor Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribe women by upper caste landlords. Issue of rape, dowry murders, crime and violence against women were taken up. All India anti-dowry and anti-rape movements were launched by women’s organisations and Civil Liberties and Democratic Rights Organisations also joined them. They launched important issues based movements.
Dowry murders have witnessed a sustained campaign by several women’s organisations and civil rights groups. Journalist wrote extensively about the dowry problem. In the 80s several women’s and other progressive organisations formed a joint front in Delhi called “Dahej Virodhi Chetna Manch”. Organisations in other major cities also campaigned through protest, demonstrations, discussions, street theatre, posters etc., against the ghasity murders of young brides for dowry. The Law Commission and the Parliamentary Committee also looked into the problem. After a sustained campaign, finally a Bill was introduced in the Parliament in 1984, which made certain changes in the Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act of 1961. The Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act 1984 was passed. The Act sets a limit to the amount given in dowry but does not ban dory. While cruelty by the husband and his relatives leading to suicide or death has become an offense, punishable with imprisonment, still dowry deaths continue. In 1986 alone, 1,285 dowry deaths were reported but there have been few convictions.
In 1829 the practice of Sati was abolished through a legislation, which marked the culmination of a debate initiated by the British.
The burning of a young widow Roop Kanwar in 1988 on the funeral pyre of her husband in Deorala, Rajasthan, sparked off strong protests by women’s organisations. The delayed response of the government came in the wake of mounting agitation in the shape of Commission of Sati (Prevention) Bill, which was hurriedly passed in the Parliament. The Act assumes that it is a practice sanctioned by the custom. It does not seek to punish those who profit by raising money by selling photographs and raising donations in the name of so-called ‘sati’. There is nothing on preventive action. The pre-sati feeling within the community mounted a counter agitation against the so-called attack on their religious custom. It is strange that the barbaric practice, against which social reformers raised their voices, still persists in a country, which reveres mother goddesses.
An anti-rape movement was launched in the last decade demanding review of the Supreme Court judgment in a rape case, which acquitted the culprit. Women activists forced the government to review Rape Laws. Several women’s organisations and legal and social activists held discussions with the Law Commission to amend the law and in 1983 Criminal Law (Amendment) Act was passed.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses