send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following statements regarding the attendance of retired judges at sittings of the Supreme Court of India is/are correct ?
1. Article 128 permits the attendance of retired judges at the sittings of the Supreme Court.
2. The Chief Justice of India may at any time request anyone who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court.
3. The Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President of India, request any person who has held the office of Chief Justice of a High Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court.
4. The Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President of India, request any person who has held the office of a Judge of the Supreme Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court.
Select the correct answer using the code given below :
1 and 4
1 and 3
2 and 4
4 only
Let’s analyze each statement:
- Statement 1: Article 128 of the Indian Constitution indeed permits the attendance of retired judges at the sittings of the Supreme Court. Correct.
- Statement 2: This says the CJI may request *anyone* who has held office as a judge of the Supreme Court or a High Court. But the Constitution requires (in Article 128) *the previous consent of the President* for such request, and the statement misses this, making it incorrect.
- Statement 3: This states, with the President’s consent, the CJI may request a former Chief Justice of a High Court. However, Article 128 refers to “judge of a High Court”, not specifically “Chief Justice”, so mentioning only Chief Justice is incomplete/incorrect.
- Statement 4: CJI, with the President’s previous consent, may request a former judge of the Supreme Court to sit and act as a judge. Correct.
So, only Statements 1 and 4 are correct.
Correct Option:
1. 1 and 4
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses