send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Each question is followed by two statements, I and II. Mark the answer:
1.If the question can be answered by using one of the statements alone, but cannot be answered using the other statement alone.
2.If the question can be answered by using either statement alone.
3. If the question can be answered by using both statements together, but cannot be answered using either statement alone.
4. If the question cannot be answered even by using both statements together.
A city doubles its population every 5 years. How long will it take to increase its population by 3,600 from its present size (assume linear increase)?
I. In 1926 the population was 475.
II. The present population is 90.
1
2
3
4
Let’s break it down:
- The question asks: How long does it take for the city’s population to increase by 3,600, assuming a linear increase, when it actually doubles every 5 years.
- Statement I: In 1926, the population was 475.
- Okay, but without the current population, knowing the starting point from 1926 doesn’t help you work out how long it’ll take to grow by 3,600 now.
- Statement II: The present population is 90.
- Again, knowing only the current population doesn’t help, because you have no rate of increase (linear or otherwise).
- If you put both statements together, you have a gap (1926 to now), but you still don’t know the yearly actual (linear) increase without the time elapsed or current “linear” growth per year.
- Also, the question says "assume linear increase," but gives exponential (doubling every 5 years) instead. That’s conflicting information—so the time to increase by 3,600 can’t be determined by either statement or even both.
Here’s what the options mean:
- Option 1 – One statement ok, not the other: Not possible—the info is incomplete either way.
- Option 2 – Either statement alone is enough: Nope.
- Option 3 – Both together are enough, but not alone: Still not true—they don’t give enough to solve.
- Option 4 – Even both together are not enough: Bingo.
Correct answer:
Option:4, 4
By: Sandeep Dubey ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses