send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements:
All cats are black.
Conclusion-I:
All dogs are black.
Conclusion-II:
Some dogs are not black.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements disregarding commonly known facts?
Only Conclusion-I
Only Conclusion-II
Neither Conclusion-I nor Conclusion-II
Both Conclusions-I and Conclusion-Il
Sol. Ans.(c).
Neither of the conclusions will be true for the given syllogism argument. To understand let’s have look on the following Euler/Venn diagrams. The circle represents Cats, Dogs and Black (dotted circle).
Above argument can be drawn in the two ways. In both the cases you can see that in some cases all dogs can be blacks but then in some cases it is not. Hence conclusion I not follows. Similarly ‘every dog will be black’ if the dotted circle will be congruent to the circle representing dog. So in this case conclusion II does not follow. To be a valid conclusion it should be true in every case. Hence both the conclusions are not valid.
By: Brijesh Kumar ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses