Explanation:

- Statement 1:

- The premise begins with "Only tablets are computers," which means all computers must be tablets, but it's not stated that all tablets are computers.

- Saying "The Xylo is a tablet" doesn't necessarily make Xylo a computer based on the given logic.

- Hence, this reasoning is not logically consistent.

- Statement 2:

- The statement claims no cricketer plays football and no footballer plays tennis.

- However, it incorrectly concludes that no cricketer plays tennis without direct relation or common ground between cricketers and tennis.

- Hence, this reasoning is not logically consistent.

- Both statements lack logical consistency in their conclusions.

- Option 4: Neither 1 nor 2:

- This is the correct option as both statements are not logically consistent.