send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Statement: Should there be complete ban on manufacture of fire crackers in India?
Argument I: No, this will render thousands of workers jobless.
Argument II: Yes, the fire cracker manufacturers use child labour.
Argument I is strong
Argument II is strong
Both I & II are strong
Both I & II are weak
- Argument I suggests that a complete ban on firecracker manufacturing could lead to unemployment for thousands of workers. This reason highlights the socioeconomic impact and potential loss of livelihood for many families, making it a strong argument.
- Argument II points out the ethical issue of child labor in the firecracker industry. While addressing child labor is important, banning manufacture completely may not directly solve this issue without targeted actions toward improving labor practices. Thus, the argument lacks the solution-oriented approach necessary for justification.
- Option 1: Argument I is strong. This is because it addresses immediate economic consequences.
- Option 2: Argument II is strong. This is not entirely accurate due to lack of direct solution to the child labor issue.
- Option 3: Both are strong. This is untrue as Argument II lacks direct resolution.
- Option 4: Both are weak. Argument I is definitely strong due to its socioeconomic implications.
By: Sandeep Dubey ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses