send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Mr. Mahimkar's department has entered into a 5-year contract with a major supplier. The contract has 2 years remaining on its term but the supplier has now asked Mr. Mahimkar to renegotiate the price of the contract because his labour and fuel costs have risen more than expected. If Mr. Mahimkar agrees to a price increase, it will increase the department's total costs substantially. The CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General) is likely to take a dim view of this during their annual audit.
Which of the following decisions is/are most appropriate?
Mr. Mahimkar should negotiate the price and try to limit the increase to a minimum so that the department's costs are not significantly affected.
Mr. Mahimkar should refuse to negotiate the price and hold the supplier liable to 'breach of contract' if supplies are affected.
Mr. Mahimkar should agree to the price increase, on the condition that no further increase would be granted during the contract period.
Mr. Mahimkar should refuse to negotiate the price, sue the supplier for breach of contract and blacklist the supplier.
according to the given situation the most appropriate decision is that Mr. Mahimkar should refuse to negotiate the price and hold the supplier liable to 'breach of contract' if supplies are affected.
By: Munesh Kumari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses