send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Sometimes, even death isn’t the great equaliser it is touted to be. For over 50,000 soldiers who lost their lives — a majority of them from undivided India — during World War I, their sacrifice was ignored by the British Empire which they fought to defend. In 2019, the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) created a special committee to investigate gaps in those that were commemorated for their sacrifice. Its findings — that thousands of the fallen were ignored — has led to the British government issuing an apology for the prejudice that this implies.
It is sometimes easy to forget just how much deep, divisive racism underpinned the entire project of colonialism. An essential aspect of maintaining this orientation towards inequality has been to invisibles the massive contributions of the colonies and their people. Take the myth of “Britain standing alone” for a significant part of World War II, with Winston Churchill standing guard against fascism single-handed. Britain was only “alone” if the significant resources and manpower from the entire empire are ignored.
The apology by the British government, however belated, is welcome. The sins of empires past, their bigotries that sought to justify systemic injustice, must be confronted wherever possible. But the unmarked graves, the forgotten names of soldiers who died for an empire in which they were not equal citizens must be just a first step.
which of the following statement/statements are correct with respect to the above passage?
History has left no room to defend the British for the massive plundering and desolation placed over these countries.
While the British claimed to be on a civilising mission, their actions weren’t even remotely aligned to this objective and failed to demonstrate a liberal approach.
This bigoted approach created deep-seated rivalries amongst religions that have yet to resolve.
None of these
all the points stated above have nothing to do with the passage, though are correct in nature but the criticality of the passage does not support it.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses