send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
IPC Section 96 to 106 of the penal code states the law relating to the right of private defence of person and property.
The provisions contained in these sections give authority to a man to use necessary force against an assailant or wrong-doer for the purpose of protecting one’s own body and property as also another’s body and property when immediate aid from the state machinery is not readily available and in so doing he is not answerable in law for his deeds. Section 97 says that the right of private defence is of 2 types:
(i) Right of private defence of body,
(ii) Right of private defence of property.
Body may be one’s own body or the body of another person and likewise property may be movable or immovable and may be of oneself or of any other person. Self-help is the first rule of criminal law. The right of private defence is absolutely necessary for the protection of one’s life, liberty and property. It is a right inherent in a man. But the kind and amount of force is minutely regulated by law. The use of force to protect one’s property and person is called the right of private defence.
82 of the IPC Act of a child under seven years of age.—nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age.
83 of the IPC Act of a child above seven and under twelve of immature understanding.—nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge of the nature and consequences of his conduct on that occasion.
What is meant by Consensus ad idem?
Disagreement of Minds
No contract between parties
Void agreement
The meeting of minds
There must be meeting of minds of both the parties on the same subject for a valid contract. EXAMPLE 1 - X contracts with B to sell his White house. B sends his acceptance for the same horse. A valid Contract is made. EXAMPLE 2- X contracts with B to sell his White Horse. B sends his acceptance for the Black horse of X. This is not a valid contract.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses