send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
‘Consideration’ means “something in return”, i.e. quid pro quo that is an essential element to find out the genuine intention of the parties of the promise to create legal relationship. Consideration is an essential component of a valid contract. Consideration is the price for the contract. An agreement without consideration is void and thus not enforceable by law except under certain circumstances. According to Sir Frederick Pollock. Consideration is the price for which the promise of the other is bought, and the promise thus given for value is enforceable.” An agreement without consideration is a bare promise and exnudo pacto non aritio actio, i.e., cannot be held to binding on the parties.
What is a Consideration?
Consideration is the price of the contract and it can be right, interest or responsibility etc. According to section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act “when at the desire of the promisor, promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing or does or abstains from doing or promises to do or to abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence, or promise is called a consideration for the promise.”
When we say that consideration is an act it acquires an affirmative tone. For example A promise to pay ` 10,000 to B if B will sell his mobile to him. When we say that consideration is abstinence or forbearance it acquires negative tone. It means one party agree not to do something in lieu of the promise of other party of the contract. Thus one party may be able to benefit due to the abstinence of another who refrains from some gain.
LEGAL PRINCIPLE: An agreement is void if its object is unlawful. FACTUAL SITUATION: Sunil had a rich uncle v\ ho owned prime property in Chennai and had lot of money in the bank. Being the only heir, Sunil was sure that he would inherit the property. One day, the uncle called him to his room and announced that he planned to marry again. This angered Sunil and he plans to murder his uncle so he hired Anuj, a murderer and entered into a contract with him to kill his uncle. Sunil agreed to pay Rs. 10 lakhs to Anuj and even paid 5 lakhs as advance. The following night Anuj entered the uncle's house intending to kill him. On reaching there, he realised that Sunil's uncle was already dead so he left without doing anything. Next day, after post mortem report, it transpired that Sunil's uncle had died due to heart attack. Now, Sunil wants to recover the advance from Anuj. Will he succeed?
Yes
No
Anuj is liable to return the amount as the act was not done by him.
None of the above.
- Legal Principle: An agreement is void if its object is unlawful.
- Factual Situation: Sunil hired Anuj to murder his uncle, paying him Rs. 5 lakhs in advance.
- Anuj did not carry out the act as the uncle was already dead from a natural cause.
- Sunil now wants to recover the advance payment from Anuj.
- Option 1, Yes: Suggests Sunil can recover the money, but hiring a murderer is an unlawful contract.
- Option 2, No: Sunil cannot recover the amount as the contract's object was illegal, making it void.
- Option 3, Anuj is liable: This suggests Anuj should return the payment since the act was not done, but legality makes the entire contract void.
- Option 4, None of the above: This would be viable only if none of the above options applied, which isn't the case here.
- Correct Answer: Option 2, No. The contract between Sunil and Anuj is void due to its unlawful nature.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses