A who is a best friend of the B B used to visit A rsquo s house during summer vacations one day when...........

Legal Reasoning Others

Section 425 of the IPC defines the offence as follows. Whoever with intent to cause, or knowing that he is likely to cause, wrongful loss or damage to the public or to any person, causes the destruction of any property, or any such change in any property or in the situation thereof as destroys or diminishes its value or utility, or affects it injuriously, commits “mischief”.

Explanation 1.—it is not essential to the offence of mischief that the offender should intend to cause loss or damage to the owner of the property injured or destroyed. It is sufficient if he intends to cause, or knows that he is likely to cause, wrongful loss or damage to any person by injuring any property, whether it belongs to that person or not.

Explanation 2.—Mischief may be committed by an act affecting property belonging to the person who commits the act, or to that person and others jointly.

426. Punishment for mischief.—whoever commits mischief shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine, or with both

A who is a best friend of the B, B used to visit A’s house during summer vacations, one day when A was not in the house B voluntarily burns a valuable security belonging to A intending to cause wrongful loss to A. Decide whether B has committed mischief ?

B has committed mischief.

B has committed mischief because knowingly caused the damage.

B has not committed the mischief because there is no evidence against B.

B has not committed.