send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
When the Maharashtra government said earlier this week that there was a possibility that the Maharashtra State Electricity Board’s servers were breached by malware inserted by unknown foreign entities, and suggested a link to the massive power outage on October 12 last year, it seemed that long held fears and warnings by sections of India’s national security policy community had come true — that hostile state actors may shift to “non-contact warfare” for which cyberspace provides unlimited opportunities. In this particular case, a US firm that studies the use of cyberspace by state actors appears to have alerted Indian authorities to the breach. The power breakdown occurred at the height of India-China tensions at the Line of Actual Control in Ladakh. There is speculation that the breakdown was a warning from Beijing that it could take hostilities to a whole new level. Delhi has denied a Chinese link to what happened in Mumbai, but the fact that unidentified entities made attempts to hack a vital arm of India’s infrastructure and the possibility that this might have played a role in paralysing its financial capital should serve as a wake-up call. For, despite the awareness for at least a decade, if not more, of the coming of a new age of digital warfare, India seems to have done little to prepare for it.
A National Cyber Power Index drawn up by the Belfer Centre at Harvard University last year ranked India 21 out of 30 countries in cyberspace abilities. The composite ranking was derived from expertise on seven parameters, broadly indicating intent and capacity: Defence, Offence, Surveillance, Control, Intelligence, Commercial and Norms. China was number 1, followed by the Netherlands, France, United States and Canada. The report concluded that India was among the 13 countries that did not exhibit either the intent or the capacity to use cyberspace to achieve policy goals. An India that considers itself a knowledge economy cannot remain defenceless and/or without adequate capacity in this sphere. The lack of expertise showed in the Maharashtra state government’s inability to detect the malware in the MSEB servers in time, and has exposed the country’s vulnerability.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message of the passage?
State actors may shift to “non-contact warfare” for which cyberspace provides unlimited opportunities.
China cannot be trusted.
Cyber warfare is new warfare in which india lacks drastically.
An India that considers itself a knowledge economy cannot remain defenceless and/or without adequate capacity in this sphere.
Cyber wars can be fought on many fronts, from a country’s electoral politics to its banks and road traffic systems to its publishing houses and military operations. India has no choice but to confront this threat, prioritise it, and invest in technology and knowledge systems that can deal with it.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses