Explanation:

Only pairs 1&2 are correctly matched.

• Sankari Prasad Case (1951): The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the First Amendment of 1951, which amended Article 368 to assert that Parliament had the power to amend the Constitution, including fundamental rights.

• The court ruled that Article 13(2) did not limit Parliament’s power to amend fundamental rights. 

• Bella Banerjee Case (1954): In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the government must provide just compensation when it acquires property through the exercise of eminent domain (compulsory acquisition).

• Vidya Devi Case (2020): The case primarily dealt with issues around the forcible acquisition of private property under the constitutional framework, but it did not specifically address the expansion of Article 31C.

• The striking down of the expansion of Article 31C happened in the Minerva Mills Case (1980), where the Supreme Court limited the scope of Article 31C, ruling that it could not override fundamental rights.

Hence option 2nd is correct.