send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Write a precis of the passage given below in about one-third of its length. Please do not give any title to it.The precis should be written in your own language.
The National Eligibilitycum Entrance Test (NEET) is mandatory for admission tomedical colleges run by religious and linguistic minority communities, the Supreme Court held on Wednesday. A threejudge Bench led by Justice Arun Mishra held that admissions solely through NEET for graduate and postgraduate medical/dental courses does not violate any fundamental and religious rights of minorities.NEET would apply for bothaided and unaided medicalcolleges run by minorities.The court dismissed arguments by the managementsof several minorityrun medical institutions, including the Christian Medical College Vellore Association, that bringing them uniformly under the ambit of NEET would be a violation of theirfundamental right to “occupation, trade and business”. The colleges had argued that imposing NEET would violate their fundamental rights of religious freedom,to manage their religious affairs, to administer their institutions. They said the State was reneging on its obligation to act in the best interest of minorities.But Justice Mishra, who wrote the 108page judgement, said it was time the field of education returned to the “realm of charity”, a character it had lost over the years. NEET was brought in to weed out malpractices in the field. The court held that the rights of trade, business and occupation or religious rights “do not come in the way of securing transparency and recognition of merits in admissions”.
By: bhavesh kumar singh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses