Write a précis of the passage given below in about one-third of its length. Please do not give any title to it. The précis should be written in your own language.

European employment policy has another focus now: not only to reduce unemployment but also to increase the number of employed people, who can thereby contribute to sustaining social protection systems. For this reason, many countries are activating their employment services to make jobs or training proposals, expanding childcare, and testing the first measures for active aging. Nevertheless, something deeper is at stake: the reorganization and coordination of employment, training, and social protection policies to support people during their life cycle, at a time when people are making increasingly diverse choices. This will make it easier to introduce more flexibility to the labour market, according to the so-called flexicurity models.

In the meantime, the original stamp of the Lisbon Strategy on the social dimension should remain clear. The best tool to adapt to change is lifelong learning. There is an improvement in terms of the rate of workers who can access lifelong learning, or in terms of the share of young people completing secondary education. But, again, there is something broader at stake: building a lifelong learning system with access points in schools, companies, and households, providing more tailor-made education and training services. Universities have a particular responsibility to respond to much more diversified demands. A reorientation of national and European policies seems to be underway, but this needs to go much further and pass another crucial test: redirecting financial means. The recent review of the Stability and Growth Pact will be under scrutiny. Certainly, fiscal consolidation and improved sustainability of social protection systems is at stake; but redirecting public expenditure, tax systems, and Structural Funds to the future-oriented priorities of investing in research, innovation and human capital are also crucial issues. We can draw another conclusion from the review of the national reform programs: differences in implementation are now very clear when we compare policy fields or the Member States. The best general performance in growth, jobs, innovation, social inclusion, and the environment seems to be happening in the countries that have implemented this Agenda more consistently. This is something that needs to be debated in each country.