Statements I No human are terrorists II ...........

Logical Reasoning (BPSC) Syllogism

Statements: I. No human are terrorists. II. Some orators are human III. No leaders are orators.

Conclusions: I. Some orators are not human II. Some leaders are human III. Some orators are not terrorists

IV. Some leaders are not terrorists.

All follow

Only III and IV follow

Only I and III follow

Only III follow

None of these

- Statement I: No humans are terrorists.

- Statement II: Some orators are human.

- Statement III: No leaders are orators.

Now let's look at the conclusions:

- Conclusion I: Some orators are not human.

- This does not follow; Statement II suggests some orators are human.

- Conclusion II: Some leaders are human.

- This does not follow; we have no information about leaders being human.

- Conclusion III: Some orators are not terrorists.

- This follows because if some orators are human, and no human is a terrorist, then some orators are not terrorists.

- Conclusion IV: Some leaders are not terrorists.

- This does not follow; no information directly connects leaders and terrorists.

Correct Answer: Option 4: Only III follows

Submit Error