The cases in which power under Article 226 or 14 of the Constitution can be exercised for breaches of alleged obligations of the state, or its agents, can be divided which of the following types?

I. Where a petitioner makes a grievance of breach of promise on the part of the state in cases where on assurance or promises made by the state, he has acted to his prejudice and predicament, but the agreement is short of a contract within the meaning of Article 299 of the Constitution.

II. Where the contract entered into between the person aggrieved and the state is in exercise of a statutory power under certain Acts or rules framed there under and the petitioner alleges a breach on the part of the state.

III. Where the contract entered into heaven between the state and the person aggrieved is non-statutory and purely contractual and the rights and liabilities of the parties are governed by the terms of the contract and the petitioner complains about breach of such contract by the State.

IV. Where the contract entered into between the State and the person aggrieved is non statutory and purely contractual, but such a contract has been cancelled on a ground de hors any of the terms of the contract, and which is per se violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.