Landmark preservation laws unfairly impinge on the freedom of owners to develop their own property a...........

Logical Reasoning(Insurance) Statement - Arguments

Landmark preservation laws unfairly impinge on the freedom of owners to develop their own property as they see fit. In some cases, owners of hotels and office buildings designated as landmarks have been forbidden to make changes in the original facades or interiors, even though they reasonably believe that the changes would enhance the structures and make them more valuable

Which of the following statements, if true, seriously weakens the author’s argument?

Altering the appearance of a historic structure sometimes does not enhance its beauty or value.

In traditional legal doctrine, ownership of a property implies the right to alter it at will.

Only buildings over 75 years old are normally affected by landmark preservation laws. (

Landmark designations must be approved by a local regulatory body before taking effect.

Historic buildings represent a cultural heritage which the community has a legitimate stake in preserving.

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Statement - Arguments

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

The conclusion of the argument is that landmark preservation laws deprive landlords of their right to use their own property. (e) comes to grips with this assumption by nothing that a landmark building may not be purely private property and some part of building may belong to the community at large. (a) does not valid as it represents only a partial attack on argument. (b) strengthens the claims that landmark preservation laws represent an unwanted interference with the rights of the landlord.