send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The former governor of Uttar Pradesh, a few months back, wrote a letter to the Centre asking for President's rule or state emergency in the state of Uttar Pradesh and said that the state government had failed to act on intelligence reports and take preemptive action to prevent mobs from taking over almost an entire district and running riot in the Muzzafar nagar district. Which of the following conclusions can be drawn from the above statement?
(A) The Governor was from the BJP and he wanted the Samajwadi Party government to be dissolved.
(B) Being the constitutional head of the state, it is his duty to inform the Centre about the situation in the state.
(C) He wants to polarise the minority voters towards the BJP.
(D) The President of India asked him to send the report to the Centre.
Only A
Only B
Only A, B and C
Only B, C and D
All of these
Being the constitutional head of the state, if the governor thinks that there is a breakdown of constitutional machinery in the state, he can send his report to the centre.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses