send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Directions : In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, even if they are at variance with the commonly known facts. Then consider the two conclusions together ignoring the commonly known facts and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement give answer.
Statement: Some Judges are reluctant to provide right information to the Government about their property. Conclusion:
I. They have earned black money and they do not want to make their property public.
II. It’s their hard-earned money and it is up to their will to disclose it or not. Nobody can force them to do so.
If only conclusion I follows.
If only conclusion II follows.
If either I or II follows.
If neither I nor II follows.
If both I and II follows
Only conclusion I follows.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses