send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Direction The following question consists of a sentence which is divided into three parts which contain grammatical errors in one or more than one part of the sentence. If there is an error in any part of the sentence, find the correct alternatives to replace those parts from the three options given below each question to make the sentence grammatically correct. If there is an error in any part of the sentence and none of the alternatives is correct to replace that part, then choose (d), i.e., None of the (I), (II) and (III) as your answer. If the given sentence is grammatically correct or does not require any correction, choose (e), i.e., No correction required as your answer.
The joint decision to enhance military-tomilitary (I)/cooperation would have gone long way in reducing (II)/border tensions and standoffs if correctly implemented. (III)
(I) The joint decision has enhanced militaryto-military
(II) cooperation would go a long way in reducing
(III) border tensions and standoffs are correctly implemented
Only (I)
Both (I) and (III)
Only (II)
None of the (I), (II) and (III)
No correction required
The first part of the sentence is grammatically correct and connects well with the other two parts to generate a coherent sentence. In the second part of the sentence, “would have gone long way” should be replaced by “would go a long way” as the phrase “gone long way” is not paired with the correct article. Moreover, there are many set expressions that require the definite article (the point is), the indefinite article (keep an eye on), or no article (head over heels). These expressions are idiomatic, so they don’t follow a particular pattern. The third part of the sentence is grammatically correct as there will be a use of the dependent clause “if” to make the sentence meaningful. Hence (c) is the correct option.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses